If you ever thought that the LAST_DDL_TIME on a table
only tells you the last time that DDL was performed
directly upon that table, then think again.
We recently noticed some tables which appeared to have been recently changed, yet we couldn't find any related DDL changes.
Then we remembered that we regularly rebuild a handful of indexes (once a week, on Sunday morning) for performance/plan-stability reasons.
Could it be that rebuilding an index resets the LAST_DDL_TIME for the index's table?
Let's find out.
SQL> create table poo (x date);
Table created.
SQL> create index poodex on poo(x);
Index created.
SQL> select object_name,
to_char(last_ddl_time, 'DD-Mon-YYYY HH24:MI:ss')
2 from dba_objects where object_name like 'POO%';
OBJECT_NAME TO_CHAR(LAST_DDL_TIM
----------- --------------------
POO 22-Mar-2011 10:09:51
POODEX 22-Mar-2011 10:09:51
SQL> alter index poodex rebuild online;
Index altered.
SQL> select object_name,
to_char(last_ddl_time, 'DD-Mon-YYYY HH24:MI:ss')
2 from dba_objects where object_name like 'POO%';
OBJECT_NAME TO_CHAR(LAST_DDL_TIM
----------- --------------------
POO 22-Mar-2011 10:11:31
POODEX 22-Mar-2011 10:11:31
Yup! In a surprising (to me) result, it looks as though rebuilding an index does indeed reset LAST_DDL_TIME on the table, even though we are not performing DDL on the table directly.
In my opinion, this is a misleading result.
Thanks to Matt Penny for doing all the work and investigation and telling me to publish the results!
EDIT: Thanks to Neil below for suggestions of other events which may or may not cause this behaviour.
I have tested creating, amending, re-compiling and dropping a procedure, but this does
not cause a change in LAST_DDL_TIME for the dependent table.
Example as follows:
14:16:55 PETE @ ETEST1D > create table foo (foocol number(5));
Table created.
14:17:20 PETE @ ETEST1D > @lastddl
OBJECT_NAME TO_CHAR(LAST_DDL_TIME,'DD-MON-
------------------------------ ------------------------------
FOO 28-Mar-2011 14:17:20
14:18:35 PETE @ ETEST1D > create procedure fooproc is
14:19:13 2 v_var varchar2(10);
14:19:26 3 begin
14:19:31 4 null;
14:19:38 5 exception
14:19:42 6 when others then null;
14:19:45 7 end;
14:19:47 8 /
Procedure created.
14:19:50 PETE @ ETEST1D > @lastddl
OBJECT_NAME TO_CHAR(LAST_DDL_TIME,'DD-MON-
------------------------------ ------------------------------
FOO 28-Mar-2011 14:17:20
FOOPROC 28-Mar-2011 14:19:50
14:20:06 PETE @ ETEST1D > create or replace procedure fooproc is
14:20:31 2 v_var varchar2(10);
14:20:34 3 begin
14:20:36 4 select to_char(foocol)
14:21:02 5 into v_var
14:21:07 6 from foo;
14:21:14 7 exception
14:21:17 8 when others then null;
14:21:18 9 end;
14:21:19 10 /
Procedure created.
14:21:20 PETE @ ETEST1D > @lastddl
OBJECT_NAME TO_CHAR(LAST_DDL_TIME,'DD-MON-
------------------------------ ------------------------------
FOO 28-Mar-2011 14:17:20
FOOPROC 28-Mar-2011 14:21:20
14:21:31 PETE @ ETEST1D > alter procedure fooproc compile;
Procedure altered.
14:22:07 PETE @ ETEST1D > @lastddl
OBJECT_NAME TO_CHAR(LAST_DDL_TIME,'DD-MON-
------------------------------ ------------------------------
FOO 28-Mar-2011 14:17:20
FOOPROC 28-Mar-2011 14:22:07
14:22:13 PETE @ ETEST1D > drop procedure fooproc;
Procedure dropped.
14:22:40 PETE @ ETEST1D > @lastddl
OBJECT_NAME TO_CHAR(LAST_DDL_TIME,'DD-MON-
------------------------------ ------------------------------
FOO 28-Mar-2011 14:17:20
Despite creating and dropping procedure, the LAST_DDL_TIME of the depdendent table is not changed. Exactly as expected.
Now trying with a comment (which is a DDL command):
14:24:20 PETE @ ETEST1D > comment on table foo is 'FOO is a test table';
Comment created.
14:24:25 PETE @ ETEST1D > @lastddl
OBJECT_NAME TO_CHAR(LAST_DDL_TIME,'DD-MON-
------------------------------ ------------------------------
FOO 28-Mar-2011 14:24:25
Again - as expected. A DDL command against the table changes the LAST_DDL_TIME.
This makes it all the more surprising that running a DDL command against an index will change LAST_DDL_TIME for its parent table.